Tuesday, December 6, 2016

Adding a schema to an active SharePlex configuration

In this post I'll address how to add a new schema to an active SharePlex configuration. This procedure doesn't require you to recreate your entire replication topology. It can be used to push data from one or more schemas in your source database to an existing or new target database. It can also be used to add replication for a schema that you're already replicating to a new target.
This post assumes some familiarity with SharePlex and an understanding of the basic architecture, filesystem layout and terminology. Examples are from an installation of SharePlex 8.6.2 on RHEL 6.6 replicating an Oracle 11.2.0.4 SE database, but should be applicable to other versions as well.

Overview

There are a handful of steps to be performed:
  • Copy the active configuration to a new file
  • Edit and validate the new configuration
  • Synchronize the new objects
  • Activate the new configuration

Copy the active configuration

Never edit an active configuration file! Instead, use the sp_ctrl utility to make a copy of the configuration:
copy config prod_config1 to prod_config2

Edit the new configuration

Still working within sp_ctrl, edit the configuration with:
edit config prod_config2
This will open an editor window where you can make changes to your configuration. At this point you'll be able to add new schemas or targets to replication.
When complete, save the changes and validate the configuration:
verify config prod_config2
It's very important that the file is verified as valid:
sp_ctrl (crbstgspx:2100)> verify config prod_config2

Config prod_config2 is valid
View detailed config in /u01/splex/var/temp/prod_config2

And not:
Verified config file too large to display
...which indicates an issue in the configuration that needs to be addressed. Absence of an actual error or warning message is a little misleading here.

Synchronize the new objects

Export or otherwise copy the newly added objects to the target database. I'll cover methods for this in a separate post.

Activate the new configuration

Activate the new configuration through sp_ctrl:
activate config prod_config2

Tuesday, May 24, 2016

Improving the performance of ORDER_LASTMOD_IDX on DCSPP_ORDER in ATG

I just stumbled on Metalink article 1603359.1, which recommends that ATG customers encountering contention on the ORDER_LASTMOD_IDX index on table DCSPP_ORDER drop the index. It's noted that this is especially likely in RAC and Exadata.

The indexed column, LAST_MODIFIED_DATE (a TIMESTAMP), frequently changes for an order and every order being changed will be adding or updating nearly the same value. This means that every session will be attempting to add data in the same index leaf, meaning there will be heavy competition for that block in RAC as each node attempts to capture it.

The index will also grow significantly faster than its data. Say an order goes through a series of ten updates; each will require that the "old" leaf be cleared of its value and a new one added further "up" the index (we're talking about a timestamp after all). An order updated ten times will leave nine empty leaves behind, which will never be reclaimed since a record will never be updated to a past time.

This can certainly be dealt with by rebuilding the index periodically, but it doesn't solve the contention issue. For shops using Standard Edition, rebuilding an index comes at the cost of locking the table, effectively causing an outage during the maintenance. Dropping the index comes at the expense of poor performance of some ATG queries that search on LAST_MODIFIED_DATE.

But there's another solution—rebuilding the index with the REVERSE keyword.

A reverse key on the index will spread activity across ten "hot" blocks instead of just one. That's because, instead of entering a timestamp based on the incremental time with the least volatile components (Year, month, day) occupying the most volatile spots (the leading edge of the index) a reverse index on this column will put the most volatile portion first (the seconds/milliseconds) and the least volatile last.

The index also won't fragment, either, since the "empty" spots in the index can be reused. Under the default configuration we would see this index grow to 11G or more in a matter of months, when the table itself was under 3G. Since converting the index to be a reverse key, it's remained at a much more stable (and manageable) 1G despite the table growing to over 5G.

Waits, in particular Global Cache waits associated with RAC attempting to obtain a cached block from another node, virtually disappeared for us.

The only downside is that any BETWEEN condition against the LAST_MODIFIED_DATE will not use the index, since a reverse key index can't be used for a range scan.

Friday, March 11, 2016

A CRS Action Script for Solarwinds Database Performance Analyzer (DPA)

I've been using Solarwinds DPA for a few years now and find it to be a great tool for monitoring Oracle databases. It's one of the few GUI tools I actually enjoy working with. The interface is clean and provides great information without being cluttered and the navigation is intuitive.

We first installed DPA on a trial basis. It went on a box that, well, let's just say it was a place I could install some trial software without having to put a lot of effort into things. It worked out and we licensed it. In place. Over time, we've become more reliant on it for monitoring our Oracle databases. But it was still on a junker, single node database server.

A junker, single node database server that was about to go out of support.

We decided to move it to a RAC cluster. We'd get gaps in our monitoring when we applied database patches, or when the node had to be rebooted, or when the node just took a dump and RAC seemed like a nice solution.

DPA is really just a tomcat application that uses an Oracle database as a repository. With Grid Infrastructure it's possible to manage a resource like tomcat within CRS. This would mean DPA could be dependent on its database resource, start automatically on a server reboot, and on node failure it would relocate to another node.

For those that don't know, CRS manages resource through an action script. This is just a shell script that CRS runs that has options for starting, stopping, checking and cleaning a resource.

I figured Solarwinds would have a canned action script. Turns out they didn't, so I rolled my own. Here it is for anyone that's interested.

First is the action script itself:

 #!/bin/sh  
   
 # Startup, shutdown, clean and check script for SolarWinds DPA (Database Performance Analyzer) processes.  
   
 . /oracle/dpa/setenv.sh  
 logfile=$DPA_LOGS/dpactl.log  
   
 usage()  
 {  
  echo "Usage: $0 start|stop|check|clean"  
  exit 1  
 }  
   
 check_dpa()  
 {  
  check=$(ps -ef | grep $DPA_HOME | grep tomcat | grep -v grep | wc -l)   
  if [ $check -eq 1 ]  
   then exit 0  
   else exit 1  
  fi  
 }  
   
 getnow()  
 {  
  now=$(date '+%m/%d/%y %H:%M:%S')  
 }  
   
 case "$1" in  
    'start') getnow  
        echo "Starting Solarwinds DPA at ${now}." | tee -a $logfile  
        echo "This will take a few moments. Please be patient..." | tee -a $logfile  
        $DPA_HOME/startup.sh | tee -a $logfile  
   
        check_dpa  
        if [ $check -eq 1 ]  
         then getnow  
            echo "Solarwinds DPA started successfully at ${now}." | tee -a $logfile  
         else echo "There was a problem starting Solarwinds DPA!" | tee -a $logfile  
        fi  
    ;;  
   
    'stop') getnow  
        echo "Stopping Solarwinds DPA at ${now}." | tee -a $logfile  
        echo "This will take a few moments. Please be patient..." | tee -a $logfile  
        $DPA_HOME/shutdown.sh | tee -a $logfile  
        EXITCODE=$?  
        check_dpa  
   
        if [ $EXITCODE == 1 ] || [ $check -gt 0 ]  
         then error "There was a problem stopping Solarwinds DPA!" | tee -a $logfile  
        fi  
   
        getnow  
        echo "Solarwinds DPA stopped successfully at ${now}." | tee -a $logfile  
        exit 0  
    ;;  
   
    'check') check_dpa  
    ;;  
   
    'clean') dpa=$(ps -ef | grep $DPA_HOME | grep tomcat | grep -v grep | awk '{print $2}')  
        if [ ! -z $dpa ]   
         then kill -9 -f $dpa  
            exit 0  
         else exit 1  
        fi  
    ;;  
   
    *) usage  
    ;;  
   
 esac  

Next is a script that sets the environment, called at the beginning of the action script. It avoids having to hard-code directory paths into the action script itself.

 export DPA_HOME=/oracle/dpa/dpa_10_1_313  
 export DPA_LOGS=/oracle/dpa/logs  

Finally, there are the commands to create the Grid/CRS resource, as well as starting, stopping and relocating it.

 $CRS_HOME/bin/crsctl add resource solarwinds_DPA -type cluster_resource -attr "ACTION_SCRIPT=/path/to/script/solarwinds_dpa.sh, DESCRIPTION='SolarWinds Database Performance Analyzer', DEGREE=1, ENABLED=1, AUTO_START=always, START_TIMEOUT=0, CHECK_INTERVAL=60, STOP_TIMEOUT=0, SCRIPT_TIMEOUT=60, RESTART_ATTEMPTS=2, OFFLINE_CHECK_INTERVAL=0, START_DEPENDENCIES='hard(ora.repo.db)', ACL='owner:oracle:rwx,pgrp:oinstall:rwx,other::r--', CARDINALITY=1, FAILURE_INTERVAL=0, FAILURE_THRESHOLD=0"  
 $CRS_HOME/bin/crsctl start resource solarwinds_DPA  
 $CRS_HOME/bin/crsctl relocate resource solarwinds_DPA -n node2  

You'll need to install DPA on all nodes of the cluster, or in a shared directory. You'll also need a directory for the startup/shutdown logs.

Tuesday, March 8, 2016

The correct answer to the interview question, "Have you ever had to restore using a backup?"

I'm constantly amazed by the answers DBA candidates give to the question, "When was the last time you had to restore using a backup?" The most common is, "Our environment is pretty stable/robust/well engineered, we've never had to do that!"

I assume it's meant to indirectly demonstrate their capabilities as a DBA, engineer or architect, and it's great that you've never had a production situation that required you to recover.

But what happens when you do have to recover.

Recently, a candidate told me that they hadn't had to recover but the process was well documented.

Right.

I wondered, "When?" Documents can be incomplete. Processes change over time. Systems are upgraded and improved and migrated to new hardware. That documentation may have been accurate when written, but the evolution of the environment may have made it confusing, misleading or even wrong. It may have made sense to the person who wrote it but it may contain assumptions or be missing steps. You may not want to discover any of this with the CEO standing over your shoulder.

Recovery is arguably the most stressful situation a DBA may encounter in their career. A slow-performing database is still running, but when you're down waiting for recovery to complete, all eyes are on the DBA. A multitude of variables add to the pressure—do I have all the files I need, did I remember to set the environment correctly, is there enough space on the recovery system?

Most DBAs who haven't had to perform a production recovery don't understand that the situation is rarely ideal. Databases, like kids and pets, only get sick after the doctor's office has closed for a long holiday weekend. (The most significant recovery I've performed began late on the Friday of Memorial Day weekend. I was alerted as I was walking out the door for a trip with my wife and kids.)

Consider that during a restore you may be at the mercy of others. You may have to rely on storage admins to make space available, network admins to open routes, system admins to build hosts from bare metal, colocation facilities to grant physical and virtual access...

Why would you leave any of that to chance?

The correct answer to the question, "Have you ever had to restore using a backup?" is (minimally) "Yes, during the last quarter I performed a restore as part of a regular readiness exercise."

If your employer doesn't require this, fight to make it their policy. At the very least you'll be able to say that you take backup and recovery seriously and demonstrate a commitment to keeping an environment stable and highly available.

DBAs that aren't practicing recovery are akin to soccer or hockey goalies who never practice defending penalty shots. The heat of the moment is not the time to be figuring it out!